Washington Post Stands Behind Romney Bullying Story

A few weeks ago the Washington Post published an article about my documentary, WHAT KILLED KEVIN, about the pivotal story that put workplace bullying on the map.  Shortly after it was amended to include unsubstantiated information.  BUT, in a highly unusual move the Washington Post editors restored the article to original form. That gives all the more weight to the fact that the Washington Post is standing behind their article about Romney’s high school actions: 

Mitt Romney bullying story holds up to scrutiny

The ombudsman is being bombarded by input from readers, via e-mail and phone calls, about the story that Post reporter Jason Horowitzwrote on Mitt Romney’s teenage years at the prestigious Cranbrook School in Michigan.

The story leads with an anecdote about Romney and some of his friends in his dormitory tackling and pinning to the ground an unpopular classmate and forcibly cutting off his bleached-blond, longish hair. The boy, John Lauber, was frightened and in tears, Horowitz explained, and the boy turned out to be gay.

The rest of the deeply reported story provides extensive context to Romney’s years there, what the school was like, where Romney fit in the boys’ hierarchy, and the fact that a lot of people liked the son of Michigan’s then-governor, George Romney.

Conservative Web sites have criticized the piece on several grounds.

The first is that The Post changed the text of one paragraph from the online version published on Thursday to the print version published on Friday without telling readers. It’s a description of how one of Romney’s high school friends, Stu White, felt after hearing about the hair-cutting prank. White was not present at the prank.

This is the original online paragraph:

“I always enjoyed his pranks,” said Stu White, a popular friend of Romney’s who went on to a career as a public school teacher and has long been bothered by the Lauber incident [emphasis added]. “But I was not the brunt on any of his pranks.”

This is the new paragraph as it appeared in print and now appears online:

“I always enjoyed his pranks,” said Stu White, a popular friend of Romney’s who went on to a career as a public school teacher and said he has been “disturbed” by the Lauber incident since hearing about it several weeks ago, before being contacted by The Washington Post. “But I was not the brunt of any of his pranks” [emphasis added].

The Post changed the story after talking to White again and discovering that White only learned of the prank in recent weeks after being told of it by a Cranbrook classmate.

Kevin Merida, national editor of The Post, said on Friday that “We should have updated it with a note.” I agree with Merida. I would have used strike-through text online to make it clear to readers that that part of the online story was changed. I think that’s just the better part of candor. There is now an editor’s note at the very bottom of the story. The Post is not calling it a correction. I think it is a correction, but not germaine to the central theme of the story.

This part of Horowitz’s story is tangential at best. It is only about how one person, who was not an eyewitness, felt about the incident.

Four of the five witnesses to the forcible haircut cited by the Post are on the record, by name, and remember they it well. Their accounts remain unchallenged. I also think it’s important to point out that Romney quickly apologized after the story was published, and although not a detailed apology, I think his demeanor in the apology seemed genuine.

The other criticisms are that this story was published knowing that President Obama was going to announce his shift in favor of gay marriage. The allegation is that somehow The Post is working with the White House to time the story.

Do I think The Post took advantage of the timing? Yes. Vice President Biden had telegraphed the president’s position on gay marriage just days earlier. This story on Romney was in preparation for three weeks. It is part of a series of biographical stories on Romney being written by Horowitz and others and edited by The Post’s Pulitzer Prize-winning writer and associate editor, David Maraniss, who is known for his best- selling biographies of major U.S. political figures.

If I were an editor I might have sped it up a little, too, to take advantage of the national discussion on gay marriage. Does that mean Post editors are timing stories with the White House? I hope not, and I doubt that is the case.

Merida said they held the printed version for a day because they didn’t want it clashing with the Thursday front page coverage of Obama changing his mind on gay marriage.

“It just happened to coincide with the time when President Obama made his statement. We factored it in and that was the decision not to run it in print on Thursday,” Merida told me.

Merida also said they wanted to give the Romney campaign enough time to respond to the story. Merida said he and Romney officials had had back and forth discussions on the story for a couple of days before it was published.

The Post got its final response from the Romney campaign Wednesday night at around 7 p.m., Merida said, the story was copy-edited that night and published online Thursday morning and in print on Friday.

“We’re a competitive news organization,” Merida said. “In the real-time journalism environment that we operate it in, we felt it was best to publish when we had it ready. You always run the risk that people have heard about it and someone else will publish before you.”

Conservative Web sites also are citing a statement that the Lauber family evidently made to New York Times reporter Ashley Parker about The Post story. Parker reported some of it in her story and tweeted other parts.

“Mr. Lauber’s family said in a statement that they were ‘aggrieved that John would be used to further a political agenda,’ Parker wrote in her story. In a tweet she also wrote that the family said “ ‘The portrayal of John is factually incorrect,’ but they would not elaborate on how it was inaccurate.”

Jason Horowitz talked to all three of John Lauber’s sisters for the story and carefully explained to them what the story was about, Merida said.

The Post has received no specific complaint of inaccuracy from the Lauber family, Merida said. “We stand by the story. It’s a full portrait. It’s the story of Mitt Romney’s years at Cranbrook.”

“Our intention with this story and future stories about both Mitt Romney and President Obama is to give people the fullest possible portrait of the men who are running for president. We will continue to explore their biographies, their decision-making, and their full lives.”

I think it’s worth noting that Maraniss is publishing in June a long biography of Barack Obama. He also wrote a lengthy piece on Obama’s formative years in Hawaii, including his high school years at the prestigious Punahou School.

I think biographical stories on presidential candidates are fair game even if controversial incidents contained in them are far in the past. Of course we all change and mature. But these stories give clues to the character of the flesh-and-blood human beings we pick to lead us. These men and women all are flawed; none is perfect. But I think it’s the media’s job to describe them and report on them as accurately and as in depth as possible. I think the story was interesting, compelling and well documented.

By   |  05:02 PM ET, 05/11/2012

3 thoughts on “Washington Post Stands Behind Romney Bullying Story

  1. Out of work now for 8 months due to: Racism, workplace violence, discrimination and retaliation for whistleblowing.
    My employer of over a decade was so careless and reckless that they instructed a new supervisor to torment me for months.
    Sadly, I work for a lead mental health agency and these bullies are protected by the states attorney general.
    I had to get electroconvulsive therapy in order to want to live again. I was totally incapacitated by the abuse that I endured.
    This I consider cruelty to a human being. I’m still trying to return to work and after all I endured they are making my return impossible.
    Just this week the hr director called one of my doctor’s to have an off the record conversation.
    I genuinely wanted to die. The abuse spanned over many years until I completely fell apart.
    Why do employer’s protect these criminals and not the victims?
    Victim of cruelty to a human being …


    • I am so sorry to read of all that you have had to experience and I truly hope that you have reached out to an employment attorney that specialized in employee complaints because several states have led the fight to protect “whistelblowers” and you may well be working in one of those. Also, you state that you have experienced workplace violence (many states have legislation in place and even more workplaces address workplace violence in their handbooks and policies), Discrimination is both a federally actionable issue and in many states you can also reach out from a state level and the best part is that you do not have to deal with the $25K cap that the proposed workplace bullying legislation includes and is a MAJOR inhindarance — then of course some states allow you to use workers comp to address mental injuries — in any event you really need to reach out to an attorney and not rely on workplace bullying pundits who are interested in selling books and self-help DVDs.


  2. For you weak minded liberals that believe everything you read, it amazes me that this liberal media can dig up all this stuff about Romney 50 years ago, yet they can’t find out anything about Obama. His education records, girlfriends etc. It’s a completely one sided attack, and if you can’t see that, stick your head back into the sand and continue to be a utterly useless individual………


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s